Do your issues start at start-up for Revit, or does it creep in over time?
Type: Posts; User: Andrew K
Do your issues start at start-up for Revit, or does it creep in over time?
In case people were not aware, the imperial units for flow rate in piping changed. In years 2020 and below, flow rate parameter units were in gallons_us_per_minute. In 2021, flow rate parameter units...
You can host it to another reference line drawn in plan and rotate the new one, if I am understanding your request.
Getting video adverts again when looking at a thread, also while typing this reply. Is this an intentional or unintentional event?
I've asked a handful of times if they wanted assistance with that, but no positive responses thus far.
There are only three values missing on that one type. If the manufacturer has a product page, you can try filling the values in yourself. You can open the type catalog in a comma delimited excel to...
The last type entry, MSRDEE1400, is missing values in three parameters.
Beyond the inability to import the type catalog in the family editor, why do you say that?
Since you have 'Room Dimensions Visibility' being controlled by 'Room Area Visibility', your third parameter will never work as one of those two options will always be on.
You may want to rethink...
What are the minimum and maximum number of support members? Array will likely not be the way to go if you need individual length adjustments.
Are you making the flanges with a lookup table or a different method?
If you don't want to place the blades again, host the blades to a reference line in a right/left elevation and rotate the reference line 90 degrees.
When using nested elements, you should control both visibility options. It isn't enough to unsee the linework, you need to disable the nested element.
In the image, I nested a linework circle into...
The view is either corrupt and should be deleted or the family is modeled in a way that would make it not show properly.
Do you have permission to post a screenshot?
If you modeled it as a sweep, change the profile.
If you modeled it with another method, let us know what you did.
Happening with me, too. So far they are unobtrusive, but I thought that users logged in would not be seeing (or see a reduced amount) of ads. They auto cycle to different ads, some with video, every...
When I had built it, I did not think it was going to be necessary for it to be able to move from the surface. The dimension is 3" due to the extents of the extrusion making up the cover.
It is...
Try changing the naming scheme of the parameters that have the _. From what I remember it does not like them too much.
Might also help to show us your lookup formulas in the family to see if those...
Have your egress factor be its own 'number' parameter. Then, in the formula have it read (ECF * 0' 1") instead of (19/128). That will get you closer to the required number.
Or, if you want it to...
My solution should only be for situations where you have surface mounted/semi-recessed/recessed in the same family on a face-based template. For what you want to do, you'd be better off making an...
What Aaron said in his first post is generally what all door content should eventually be.
The hardest thing about using manufacturer door content is that there is no 'one way' to develop certain...
Is the spacing between elements always going to be 130? Why is your input not the number of grids but the length of the claustra? You will always have a remainder on the last grid element unless you...
You did not finish your formula string the first time around. It's missing the end "THEN" value and missing an if statement.
You can end the formula at :
if(Diameter < 700 mm, ((Ext radius +...
When using the array tool in the family editor, it is always best practice to 'nest'/load in the arrayed component.
You dimensioned to the geometry of your fixture rather than use reference planes. That's why you're having trouble constraining the cable extrusions.